Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 41,390
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2022, 7:35 am
The threshold problem with Judge Cain's opinion in Louisiana v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 6:02 am
In FDA v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:00 am
It upheld the state's power to impose a nominal fine on an unvaccinated person. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:00 am
It upheld the state's power to impose a nominal fine on an unvaccinated person. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 4:21 am
Last week, in Verdone v Verdone, 2022 WL 454048 [N. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
In both Biden v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
United States Sarah Palin has lost her libel claim against the New York Times. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm
They state there that ’we present empirical evidence of “hold-up”—i.e., evidence of opportunistic behavior by SEP enforcers that is intended to unreasonably inflate royalties. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 5:09 am
A central issue in the case is whether Trump is entitled to official immunity from civil liability under Nixon v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
My point is to suggest, in broad strokes, not just the strictures of narrative-normative anarchy, but also its substantial relevance for the expression of power among collectives with different conceptions and rationalizations of the power to compel, or better to make individuals think they are exercising free choice, when in fact they are deeply embedded in systems designed to manage, constrain, predict, and discipline choice. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 1:49 pm
Power is a big deal; secondly, is it doing something that looks exclusionary/anticompetitive v. legit competition on the merits. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
The 9th Circuit in Bosley v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 9:31 am
Current state of play The government’s newest list of priority offences (those to which the proactive duty would apply) mostly involves individuals as victims but also includes money laundering, an offence which does not do so. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 10:45 pm
One day after the United States International Trade Commission ("USITC" or just "ITC") instituted three investigations further to Ericsson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:46 pm
Al-Bawardi; Dlayal Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:14 pm
(State Board of Equalization v Young, 299 US 59 (1936)). [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:59 am
Alderman v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:47 am
Nike v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:28 am
The plaintiffs in Havlish v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:54 am
The Supreme Court rejected Nixon’s challenge in Nixon v. [read post]
