Search for: "See v. See" Results 6101 - 6120 of 122,004
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2023, 12:29 pm by Giles Peaker
Avon Ground Rents Limited v Canary Gateway (Block A) RTM Company Ltd (2023) EWCA Civ 616 This was the Court of Appeal judgment on a an appeal related to (but not from) the Upper Tribunal decision in Avon Ground Rents Ltd v Canary Gateway (Block A) RTM Company Ltd & Anor (2020) UKUT 358 (LC) (Our note here). [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:09 pm by Holly
However, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:19 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:12 am by David Ashmore and Christopher Whitehead
In particular, seafaring employers should now take particular notice of their employees’ wages, even where their vessels are foreign-flagged and they have little connection to the UK. 1 See, for example, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, Art. 942 Diggins v Condor Marine Crewing Services Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 11333 Maritime Labor Convention, Regulation A2.4(2)4Seahorse Maritime Ltd. v Nautilus International [2018] EWCA Civ 27895 Trade Union and Labour… [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am by INFORRM
After some hesitation (see below), Google Bard has accepted that there is no such case. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The injunction prohibits defendants from continuing to collect co-payments and does not mandate specific conduct by them (State of New York v Town of Haverstraw, 219 AD2d 64, 65-66 [2d Dept 1996]; see generally Second on Second CafÉ, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The injunction prohibits defendants from continuing to collect co-payments and does not mandate specific conduct by them (State of New York v Town of Haverstraw, 219 AD2d 64, 65-66 [2d Dept 1996]; see generally Second on Second CafÉ, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
29 May 2023, 10:30 pm by Sherica Celine
Visit the Legal Developments page to see the latest topics, which also include breaking legal news and related Practical Guidance content. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
These provisions, placed today in Chapter V of the UPCA, include the definition of the patent’s owner prerogatives to prevent the direct and indirect use of the invention (Art. 25 and 26), the list of limitations concerning the scope of patent protection, including inter alia, acts done privately or for experimental purposes, the use of biological material for the purpose of breeding, discovering and developing other plant varieties (Art. 27), the condition of the right for prior use… [read post]