Search for: "Session v. State" Results 6101 - 6120 of 6,592
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation)   US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR obviousness:… [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 5:01 am
  Currently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering Judge McMahon’s dismissal of Southern Cherry Street LLC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:35 am
  Similar legislation, the Medical Device Safety Act of 2008, was introduced last session to overturn the Supreme Court’s decision in Reigel v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 9:59 am
After a month long recess the United States Supreme Court is back in session and ready to rule in Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
Clearing House (08-453) — state power to enforce state laws against racial bias in mortgage lending Wed., April 29: Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
United States, No. 08-497 (cert. petition filed Oct. 15, 2008) Development Moratorium a Taking Under Lucas - Monks v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 7:55 pm
V tribunals in Iraq, yet we refuse to institute them at Gitmo. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 6:09 pm
A similar bill passed Washington state's Legislature in its last session. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 2:55 pm
The amendment seeks to undo the decision of the Supreme Court in Badal v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:42 pm
Texas, the 2003 case that overturned state sodomy laws, but perhaps they'll submit a question in writingMore on Roper v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 1:28 pm
United States) is notable for revealing his concern over unequal access to documents between State Parties and the limitations on the Court's ability to establish and assess facts. [read post]