Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 7,506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
In 1976, in a case called Woodson v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:52 am
Individuals may be disqualified for employment because of misrepresentations in employment applicationMartin v Marchiselli, 262 AD2d 171Section 50.4 of the Civil Service Law authorizes the state department of civil service or the responsible civil service commission to disqualify and terminate an applicant or an employee if he or she has materially misrepresented his or her qualifications on the application form. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:47 am
In McMillan v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 8:45 am
Slater v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
” [Ed: 108 characters, nice work Admiral!] [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
[Ed: 108 characters, nice work Admiral!] [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:10 am
How could I have slogged through Pennoyer v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
And the limitations imposed by our constitutional law upon the action of the governments, both State and national, are essential to the preservation of public and private rights, notwithstanding the representative character of our political institutions. [read post]
Shining the Spotlight on Trademark Bullies (a Long-Delayed Recap of a Trademark Scholars Roundtable)
13 Oct 2010, 10:16 am
My exemplar is Lifestyle Lift v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:27 am
In People v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 11:08 am
As this Court put it in Giebelhausen v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 5:10 pm
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs set out above, see [17]). [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 4:37 am
United States v Jinian. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
”The Sheldon Abend Revocable Trust, v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Mason, 527 F.3d 252, 255 (2d Cir. 2008) (citing United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:51 am
C.A.), Brooke J.A. stated: The question of when and in what circumstances the court may order such a sale was considered broadly by Grant J. in Cook v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:52 am
State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 7:20 am
In this week’s case (Baxter v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:08 pm
Snyder v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:30 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Court Erred in Applying 18-Level Enhancement in Re-Entry Case United States v. [read post]
