Search for: "State v. Dollar" Results 6101 - 6120 of 9,591
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm by Eric
The privacy policy stated, “You can opt out of receiving a cookie by changing your browser settings to prevent the receipt of cookies. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:09 am by Don Cruse
Rehearing denied in the “billion dollar” civil-service case City of Dallas v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
Nike went after one end user for ordering Chinese counterfeit trainers via the Internet: EWPCC summary judgement in Nike v E Bateman (IP Dragon) Crosstown Music bitten by partial assignment of copyright: EWCA decision in Crosstown v Rive Droite & Ors (IP Whiteboard) Possibility of obtaining summary judgment in patent cases: Patents Court decision in Virgin Atlantic v Delta (Kluwer Patent Blog) Keeping down the price of copyright justice (1709 Blog) United… [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:48 am by Sandy Levinson
  Part of American Stetll sets out the collapse of an older liberal consensus on the meaning of "separation of church and state," encapsulated in the rhetoric (if not necessarily the result) in Everson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm by MOTP
Sapphire sought to recover millions of dollars for water damage, increased construction costs, delay costs, lost revenue, and other losses that the builder's risk policy allegedly covered or should have covered but the permanent policy did not. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am by admin
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 7:58 pm
The tendency of members of Congress to think about their own districts and states rather than the national interest is not new. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:12 am by Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle
The Yoder Court barely mentioned the five-dollar fine that the state had imposed on the parents of children who did not attend school. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:50 pm by Adam Levitin
Last week the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey issued an opinion in a case captioned Kemp v. [read post]