Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 6101 - 6120 of 8,250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Nicole Kellner-Swick
  [9] ORC 2329.03 [10] IRC § 6323(b)(8); See Also, North Carolina Joint Underwriting Assn. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 5:23 pm by Nicki Milionis
” Despite the decision in Perilya v Nash [2015] NSWSC 706 there was a concern that the courts might interpret the model provision more narrowly outside of NSW. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Larry Tolchinsky
They also paid future mortgage payments to the new mortgage holder. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:54 am
The question from the Philips case (which the INTA submission refers to, but doesn't replicate, in its submission) is:Does Article 6(2)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 3295/94 of 22 December 1994 (the old Customs Regulation) constitute a uniform rule of Community law which must be taken into account by the court of the Member State which, in accordance with Article 7 of the Regulation, has been approached by the holder of an intellectual-property right, and does that rule… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:12 pm by Lawrence Taylor
They justified this by saying that a license was a "privilege", not a "right" — and since the license holder had no rights, the state could do what it wanted. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
Texas put the new law into use in three state elections, doing so initially soon after the Supreme Court in its 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:27 am by Lawrence Taylor
They justified this by saying that a license was a "privilege", not a "right" — and since the license holder had no rights, the state could do what it wanted. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:28 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  For example, if State A is home to one percent of all U.S. citizens, the tax must collect one percent of all revenues from State A. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:00 pm by Florian Mueller
Patently-O also analyzed two decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States that came down yesterday and relate to attorney fee-shifting in patent litigation: Octane Fitness v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 5:29 am
  It was only too bad that the event was not held after the latest decision of Mr Justice Carr in the TQ Delta v Zyxel saga was published. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
Texas decisions, at least twenty-one state advocacy organizations formed.Some achieved legislative victories, convincing state lawmakers to repeal sodomy prohibitions.Meanwhile, advocates urged state courts to use state constitutional law to provide protections for lesbians and gay men.Of the eleven states that decriminalized sodomy after Bowers, eight did so through the courts.Not only did state court activism result in on-the-ground victories,… [read post]