Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Heard" Results 6101 - 6120 of 7,749
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2011, 11:08 pm by The Legal Blog
The right to appeal is a statutory right and it can be circumscribed by the conditions in the grant ..............The purpose of the Section is to act in terrorem to make the people comply with the provisions of law. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 2:24 am
The sums of money – including the costs - involved in this case are well beyond the experience and even the contemplation of most people. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:16 am by Isabel McArdle
X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau [2011] EWCA Civ 28 – Read judgment The Court of Appeal has ruled that disabled people are not protected by domestic or European legislation against discrimination when they undertake voluntary work. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 6:56 am by Eric
I realize it's an uber-cool phone, but still, IT'S A PHONE, PEOPLE! [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:03 am by Hull and Hull LLP
 And people who might not recognize they have those rights. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
The trial court's original order entering the jury verdict is available on Westlaw as Liebeck v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:54 pm
Last week, the New York Court of Appeals rejected a request for discretionary review in People v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:27 am by Peter McCormick
  The ideas of these theorists were unquestionably and undeniably massively influential, and changed the lives of many people who had never heard of them and would possibly not have understood them, but they did so through indirect means of persuasion or permeation, not through the direct application of decisive authority and power. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am by INFORRM
Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) JIH v News Group Newspapers, heard 14 January 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ) Brady -v- Norman, heard 19 January 2011 (The President of the Queen’s Bench Division, Smith and Aikens LJJ) McKeown v Attheraces Ltd,… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:42 am by SHG
When Orin Kerr noted the unusual opinion out of Fourth District Court of Appeals in Florida in Ruiz v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 10:41 am
The case being heard by the court last week follows the previously overturned $100 million verdict of Judge Larson in favor of Mattel. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
Wednesday was a busy day at the Court: the Justices heard oral argument in two cases and issued opinions in three others. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
Wednesday was a busy day at the Court: the Justices heard oral argument in two cases and issued opinions in three others. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:41 am by Russ Bensing
”)  And so last week the US Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kentucky v. [read post]