Search for: "US v. Givens" Results 6101 - 6120 of 51,324
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2022, 7:46 am by CMS
  On 9 November 2021, the Supreme Court heard the appeal in Harpur Trust v Brazel. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
" Garnett in turn says that cases like Zubik v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
Income tax focuses on actual income or gains acquired by citizens in any given year. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 2:43 pm by Ryan Roberts and Ariel E. Debin
To accomplish these goals, the Final Rule adds a new solicitation provision, DFARS 252.215-7016, Notification to Offerors – Postaward Debriefings, for use in competitive negotiated solicitations, and a new contract clause, DFARS 252.216-7010, Postaward Debriefings for Task Orders and Delivery Orders, for use in multiple-award contracts. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:23 am by Sam Callahan and Allon Kedem
ShareThe Supreme Court heard argument on Monday in LeDure v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 9:52 am by Nick Austin and Sofia Papaspyropoulou
The environmental benefit from the transition to electronic trade documents is expected to be significant given that an estimated 28.5 billion paper trade documents are used annually. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 2:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court, in a magisterial leading judgment given by Lady Black and in consenting judgments given by Lord Stephens and Lady Arden, accepted that the inherent jurisdiction continued to allow the High Court to sanction placements in unapproved   Discussion On one analysis, it looks like the statutory regime developed in and under section 25 of the 1989 Act, and its equivalent in Wales, was intended to be comprehensive. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 6:02 pm
 Pix Credit HERE I thought it useful to share the Chinese and English translation of the 中华人民共和国个人信息保护法  Personal Information Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]