Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 6,771
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2008, 3:13 pm
A repeal in November doesn't necessarily mean Roe v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 1:53 pm
Harkless v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 11:03 am
I emphasize "current" because a four-justice bloc (Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito) on the Supreme Court wants to overrule Roe v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
(The case is No. 08-120, Duke, et al. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 7:34 pm
As a commentator to an earlier thread here noted, Judge Surrick relies particularly heavily on Hollander v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 8:10 pm
Supreme Court's 2003 ruling in Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 4:36 pm
As I predicted here, Judge Surrick threw out Berg v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 5:37 pm
Stewart v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
Smartly, Eisenhower maintained the New Deal policies and supported civil rights, including the 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:32 pm
Here is the Verified Motion to Acknowledge Jursidiction and Establish Expedited Briefing Schedule in the case of Curley v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:26 pm
Under the facts of this hypothetical case (stylized as McCain v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 6:35 pm
Lumm v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 9:49 pm
Just two years ago, Republicans held a commanding 23,200 registered voter lead. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 2:09 pm
My latest FindLaw column praises the Supreme Court for its per curiam in Brunner v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 12:52 pm
"Eight Years After Bush v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 4:42 pm
My latest Findlaw guest column is now available (and check out their Elections 2008 page). [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 2:37 pm
The theory of Buckley v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 1:35 pm
The theory of Buckley v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 7:30 pm
This is the nature of negative political campaigning, and it is sickening to think that any significant number of voters will make their decisions about who should be entrusted with the health, safety and welfare of the US for the next four years based on such disgusting campaign messages. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:43 pm
Orin Kerr at the Volokh Conspiracy thoughtfully suggests that such an actor should not be permitted to do so as the Supreme Court's per curiam decision follows the logic of Bush v. [read post]
