Search for: "v. "
Results 6101 - 6120
of 493,818
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2010, 6:54 am
Fredrick Oduol Oduor, Deakin University, has published The Evolution of Internet Defamation Law: Will Dow Jones v. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 2:46 am
The recent district court slip opinion in Jamison v McClendon, __ F. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Johnson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 6:07 am
Today is the last day of the Yucaipa v Barnes & Noble trial in Delaware with Vice Chancellor Strine presiding. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 1:55 am
Regina v Winters Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “For the purpose of making the required assumptions in order to determine whether a defendant had benefited from drug trafficking, the Crown was required to prove on the balance of probabilities that the defendant had made payments out of payments received by him in connection with his drug trafficking. [...] [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:33 am
Essex Trading Standards v Singh; [2009] WLR (D) 81 “In order to acquit a defendant of a charge of unauthorised use of registered trade marks in relation to goods, contrary to s 92(1)(c) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, under the statutory defence provided by s 92(5) of the Act, it was not enough for the [...] [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:02 am
The case of Demiraj v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 11:01 am
Courtesy of Eric Gouvin (Western New England) we're delighted to publish some of the images of the case he collected as part of his recent (and highly enjoyable) conference on that staple of Business Associations casebooks, Wilkes v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:23 am
Law Society v McPhail [2011] WLR (D) 45 “In the interests of fairness, a person charged with contempt of court whose liberty was therefore at stake should be able to appear at a hearing to answer points raised by his accusers. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:12 am
In the human rights litigation over Argentina's "dirty war" of the 1970s and 1980s, a dispute over personal jurisdiction has reached the Supreme Court and will be argued on October 15 (DaimlerChysler AG v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: CIVIL – DECLARATORY JUDGMENT DA 15-0459, 2016 MT 49N, ROBERT REED and BETTY REED, Plaintiffs, Counter-Defendants, and Appellants, v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 4:32 am
Next week, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Kerry v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 12:07 pm
Last week, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California unsealed the indictment in the United States of America v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:35 am
Lee v Whitehouse Court of Appeal “A judge who was asked to make a possession order under section 98(1)(a) of the Rent Act 1977 on the ground that there was suitable alternative accommodation available had to decide whether or not it was reasonable to make an order by evaluating the effect on both parties if an order [...] [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 8:17 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 08-0457, 2009 MT 263, STEVEN JAKSHA, Plaintiff, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 9:19 am
Andrew Tutt, Yale University Information Society Project, & Law School, has published Textualism and the Equity of the Copyright Act: Reflections Inspired by American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:23 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari today in Fox v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 11:21 am
In a fascinating Op-ed piece in the New York Times on August 12, 2010, Linda Greenberg analyzes the decision in Perry v Schwartzenegger, the recent California appellate decision overturning Proposition 8 that outlawed same-sex marriage in California. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:14 am
Dick "the Rock Star" Kaplan has recently published an article on the Supreme Court's recent (really recent-5/16/22) decision in Cigna v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:27 am
Regina v Burns Court of Appeal “Any right there might be to withdraw licence to a visitor to remain in one’s house and to use reasonable force to eject her therefrom could not be extended to one’s motor vehicle. [read post]
