Search for: "CHANCE v. STATE"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 12,120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2014, 8:50 am
Supreme Court set up a procedure in Anders v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:27 am
The dissenting judge suggested that the manual’s permissive language regarding progressive discipline did not show an unequivocal intent to bind the city to just-cause employment (Freeze v City of Decherd, Tennessee, June 4, 2014, Sargus, D). [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
In Exxon-Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:42 am
The resolution has no realistic chance of generating a constitutional amendment. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:25 am
Commentators continue to discuss Monday’s decision in Bond v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:38 pm
To read more on this case, please read Michael Eason v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 10:05 am
Yesterday's decision in Bond v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:53 am
The idea is that the experts get a chance to weigh in on the proposal before generalists in the court decide if they acted legally. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:22 pm
United States); whether it violates the “privileges or immunities” of a businessman who wants to operate a ferry service to be denied a permit to compete with an existing service on a public lake in Washington State (Courtney v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:05 am
You'll get a chance to sign up for one or both at the publisher's website. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:43 am
Louisiana joined the fray late in Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 7:43 pm
In 2002, in Atkins v. [read post]
Negligence applies to quid pro quo claim where jilted HR employee lobbied to fire her would-be lover
29 May 2014, 7:55 am
Giving a male general manager a chance to put before a jury his claim that he was terminated based on lobbying by a female human resources employee whose romantic and sexual advances he had repeatedly rebuffed, the appeals court vacated in part the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the employer (Velazquez-Perez v Developers Diversified Realty Corp, May 23, 2014, Kayatta, W). [read post]
28 May 2014, 1:28 pm
But take your lumps and admit that what transpired should not have occurred.Because only then will you have a chance of getting paragraphs like this one from Judge Kozinski:"After oral argument before us, the United States Attorney 'concede[d] that [the] cross-examination of defendant was error' and advised us that she 'has instituted—in addition to existing training—a semi-monthly training update for the Criminal Division regarding pre-trial… [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:19 am
Indeed, neither recommending officer stated in his affidavit that he did not have a chance to consider the employee. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Last year, when the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:45 pm
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:44 pm
This case, AF Holdings v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:04 pm
See, e.g., McReynolds v. [read post]