Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 6121 - 6140 of 16,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2020, 6:03 am by Nathaniel Sobel
What they do provide are images in which “1 pixel” represents a single person, meaning that “an individual’s characteristics are not observable in the images. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Even if the traditional core purpose of economic activity, to maximize the value of the economic value of collective activity, is retained, its meaning and the factors that must be considered can substantially change the environment in which decisions are made and analytics are fashioned. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
Childs, No. 071495, 071597 Convictions for conspiracy to commit murder for hire resulting death are affirmed over claims that the district court erred by: 1) denying defendant's Rule 29 motion for acquittal; 2) allowing witness to testify to an out-of-court statement made by indicted co-conspirator; 3) requiring one defendant to testify under a statutory grant of use immunity at his co-defendant's trial; 4) failing to order one defendant, over his attorney's… [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Kevin Kaufman
This also means few or no targeted tax breaks for specific activities carried out by businesses or individuals. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:50 pm by Kevin Kaufman
This also means few or no targeted tax breaks for specific activities carried out by businesses or individuals. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am by John Elwood
Walgreen Co., 18-349. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 2:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Co. (1976) (stating that Title VII is "not limited to discrimination against members of any particular race"). [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm by Brian Fong
Interpreting Section 552’s use of the term “cause” as equivalent to a “level of force or coercion,” the district court found that both Mendoza and Gordon voluntarily chose to work additional hours, including trading shifts with co-workers, picking up shifts at other locations, or accepting additional work when offered by co-workers or supervisors. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:47 am by Jonathan Bailey
Furthermore, it argues that it was not responsible for starting the fire, meaning that it had no obligation to protect the recordings from something it couldn’t control. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 8:06 pm by Arkady Itkin
" This doesn't mean however that you should remain helpless and do nothing to protect yourself and your position at workplace. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 7:21 am by Ilana Redstone
" Here are the recommendations we provide in the book: [1.] [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:19 am
Just because an unauthorized person reads an e-mail, however, does not necessarily mean that he is liable under the CFAA. [read post]