Search for: "COOPER v. STATE" Results 6121 - 6140 of 7,425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Mr Bloom’s brief was to make recommendations to the Secretary of State on how government should engage with faith groups in England. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
  The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
She learned she was pregnant just days before the United States Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 8:42 am by Russell Knight
Burris, 273 NE 2d 605 – Ill: Supreme Court 1971 Failure to cooperate on cross-examination means the testimony elicited on direct-examination may be struck. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
I also learned about the land rights hikoi (march) led by then 79-year-old Dame Whina Cooper in 1975 involving more than 5,000 people, and about the 506-day occupation of Bastion Point in 1977-78. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 1:33 am
Following their decision to cooperate, the footage of the concert was restored and an entertainment agency was hired to promote the project. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 5:35 am by Beth Kivelä
Both parties entered the agreement in a calm rational state, in good time prior to the wedding. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:00 pm by Karel Frielink
It would therefore be wise to keep in mind the ruling of the Supreme Court of 6 December 1954 in the case of Holland v United States (348 U.S. 121, 137-138 [1954]): Circumstantial evidence in this respect is intrinsically no different from testimonial evidence. [read post]