Search for: "COOPER v. STATE"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 7,370
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2010, 12:24 am
; Benedetta Ubertazzi, Intellectual Property and State Immunity from Jurisdiction in the New York Convention of 2004. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:10 pm
Under Commonwealth v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 4:00 am
Judge James V. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 11:25 am
Daugherty, Jr. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 5:08 pm
" See American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:23 am
In the well-known 1987 divorce case of Atkinson v Atkinson, the Court of Appeals established the following test for application of the doctrine:[W]e adopt the doctrine of equitable parent and find that a husband who is not the biological father of a child born or conceived during the marriage may be considered the natural father of that child where (1) the husband and the child mutually acknowledge a relationship as father and child, or the mother of the child has cooperated… [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 5:38 pm
See also Cooper v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 11:21 am
(Interesting advance note on that upcoming report: the CIO of the Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System is a Commission Member; SERS has been lead plaintiff in a number of securities actions, including against CIGNA Corp. and Royal Dutch/Shell Transport, as they then were.) [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:56 pm
The judge cited a 1982 7th Circuit case called Neavear v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 9:19 pm
One would repeal the so-called “Chevron” doctrine, so named for a 1984 Supreme Court case of Chevron USA v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 5:55 am
I have learned that some UN Member States believe that only the UN Security Council can “create” an international criminal tribunal in the United Nations. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:55 am
The possibility of continued employment becomes even more tenuous if the employee then refuses to cooperate with the employer. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:45 am
Although the conduct test was not met, the effects test was.The effects test asked whether conduct outside of the United States had a substantial adverse effect on U.S. investors or securities markets, the court noted. [read post]
10 May 2011, 6:51 am
See Worrell v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 8:40 am
These questions were recently considered by the Idaho Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 10:20 am
If you have read Part I, you are familiar with the Court of Chancery's decision in TR Investors LLC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm
In a case called Foucha v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:03 pm
Compare People v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 4:07 pm
In People v Settles, it was held that this is impermissible. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 2:42 pm
In the leading case, Allied-Signal Inc. v. [read post]
