Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 48,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2009, 2:44 pm
Today reasons for judgement were released by the BC Supreme Court (Geisbrecht v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 5:52 am
The case Patel v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 10:06 am
Clearly, one or more factors have changed the plaintiffs' cost-benefit calculus sufficient to open the litigation floodgates. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 11:18 pm
Introduction Elite Construction Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 1:40 pm
We should even be willing to offer our assistance when it comes at some cost to us. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 10:37 am
” Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am
OPM and the unconstitutional conditions argument in Mass v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:05 pm
” (The rule in MGN v UK in domestic law) If so: Whether the effect of this should be that the costs orders made in the appeals must be amended to exclude the defendant in each case from paying the success fee and the ATE premium for which the claimant is liable (The application of the rule in MGN v UK to the appeals). [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 10:11 am
Justice Quinn in Bruni v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Peabody Coal Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm
In a recent Texas case, Mary Lou Lara v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:04 am
Additional Resources: Castelluccio v Intern Business Machines Corp, 2012 WL 5408420 (2012). [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:27 am
In Casey et al. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:34 am
The employees’ second proposed accommodation had a greater than de minimus cost to the employer as well. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:12 pm
Oral argument in Horne v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 3:11 am
Bistline discusses the state of the doctrine of issue preclusion before B&B v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 1:49 pm
As I mentioned on Friday, it’s likely that the consolidated follow-up cases to Hobby Lobby, involving nonprofit organizations’ RFRA challenges to the government’s religious accommodation, will henceforth collectively be known as Zubik v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
The judgment also awarded her all of her recoverable court costs. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:42 am
In particular, he referred to Stack v Dowden and Jones v Kernott, the recent authorities on the beneficial entitlement to a shared home. [read post]
