Search for: "Crawford " Results 6121 - 6140 of 6,160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2006, 4:42 am
Crawford suggested that Roberts may still apply to such statements, or that perhaps the Clause poses no obstacle at all to them. [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 1:08 am
Street, 471 U.S. 409 (1985), was specifically reaffirmed in Crawford, 541 U.S. at 59 n.9. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 6:13 am
The letter said that, after finding out there were problems with the Kirschner wire and Steinmann pins, Teleflex did not re-evaluate and reinspect the lots that had been released for distribution to determine the extent and seriousness of the problem.Teleflex was in the news back in October of 2005 when the then-FDA head Lester Crawford sold shares in the company. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 8:17 pm
  Of course, Crawford didn't announce that goal straight out, but that's what the case really means. [read post]
10 Aug 2006, 8:37 am
I previously posted a brief, preliminary summary, prepared by Andrew Fine, of the Supreme Court's decisions after Davis, denying certiorari in some Crawford-related cases involving fresh accusations and GVRing (granting, vacating and reversing for reconsideration in light of Davis) in others. [read post]
3 Aug 2006, 3:09 am
It's a Crawford case decided a month after the U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2006, 7:15 am
Under the ordinary post-Crawford procedure, the issue of unavailability arises only if there has been a prior oportunity for confrontation. [read post]
18 Jul 2006, 2:02 pm
Crawford that Missouri had to provide a particular inmate with transportation to an abortion facility and the American Civil Liberties Union ( [read post]
18 Jul 2006, 1:52 pm
The COA applied Crawford and Davis and held that a reasonable person in the child's position would believe that the statements might be used prosecutorially and, thus were testimonial.The state also argued that Mr. [read post]
18 Jul 2006, 4:30 am
Brooklyn Law School, under the leadership of Bob Pitler, ran an excellent symposium on Crawford in February 2005. [read post]
12 Jul 2006, 7:55 am
North Carolina, were appeals from state supreme court decisions holding such statements to be nontestimonial under Crawford. [read post]
26 Jun 2006, 5:59 am
We rejected that argument (and our prior cases that had accepted it) in Crawford v. [read post]
25 Jun 2006, 6:42 pm
Given that SCOTUS has taken a Crawford retroactivity case, that seemed a risky strategy.It will be interesting to see if the Colorado Supreme Court waits until after Burton to decide Johnson. [read post]
23 Jun 2006, 10:57 am
Member Schaumber would not order a remedy for Hall, Norris, or Crawford. [read post]
19 Jun 2006, 12:26 pm
Indiana) Nos. 05-5224 & 05-5705 (June 19, 2006), the Court held that, for purposes of determining whether a statement is "testimonial" and therefore covered by the Confrontation Clause rights recognized in Crawford, statements are nontestimonial when made in the course of police interrogation under circumstances objectively indicating that the primary purpose of interrogation is to enable police assistance to meet an ongoing emergency. [read post]
2 Jun 2006, 2:56 pm
Craig and Bob welcome, Professor Susan Crawford, law professor at the Cardozo Law School, Professor Eugene Volokh, professor at UCLA Law School and founder of the blog, The Volokh Conspiracy and Professor Miriam Cherry, visiting professor at Hofstra and blogger for ContractsProf and Concurring Opinions. [read post]
2 Jun 2006, 2:56 pm by Legal Talk Network
Craig and Bob welcome, Professor Susan Crawford, law professor at the Cardozo Law School, Professor Eugene Volokh, professor at UCLA Law School and founder of the blog, The Volokh Conspiracy and Professor Miriam Cherry, visiting professor at Hofstra and blogger for ContractsProf and Concurring Opinions. [read post]
15 May 2006, 4:37 am
Bockting, No. 05-595, thus agreeing to review the decision of the Ninth Circuit that Crawford applies retroactively to habeas cases. [read post]