Search for: "Defendant Doe 2"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 40,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
” (2) The court determined that the trial court erred in calculating the defendant’s prior record level (PRL) based on the defendant’s stipulation that a prior conviction for expired operators’ license was a Class 2 misdemeanor. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:47 am
What Does the Ruling Mean for the DUI Case? [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 12:42 pm
The Court does not find Homeward’s argument to be persuasive.2 Relators assert that they have produced to Homeward all the factual documents accompanying the disclosure statements, as well as the identity of any persons named within the disclosure statements (Dkt. #136 at p. 7). [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:24 am
Specifically, the defendant did not (1) previously peremptorily challenge the juror; or (2) state in his motion to renew his challenge for cause that he would have challenged that juror peremptorily had his challenges not been exhausted. (2) The defendant’s next argument on appeal was that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress his confession. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:11 am
May 21, 2012), yes it does. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 12:24 pm
Luis had $2 million in untainted funds. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
In [*2]addition, a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, in itself, does not give rise to a private cause of action against an attorney or law firm (see Cohen v Kachroo, 115 AD3d 512, 513; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 814; Kallman v Krupnick, 67 AD3d 1093, 1096; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim, & Ballon, 172 AD2d 254, 254). [read post]
11 May 2007, 7:39 am
The SR statute, 3583, omits, for example, 3553(a)(2)(A). [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 6:32 am
This means that a defendant does not owe an injured person anything. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:27 am
McNeely, 133 S.Ct. 1552 (2013), that that the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream does not constitute an exigency in every impaired driving case that justifies a warrantless, nonconsensual blood draw. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:27 am
McNeely, 133 S.Ct. 1552 (2013), that that the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream does not constitute an exigency in every impaired driving case that justifies a warrantless, nonconsensual blood draw. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:13 pm
The client was not in favor of a trial as she just wanted it to be over so she could go home and 2. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 5:30 am
Waste Mgmt., Inc., No. 94-6865, 1995 WL 481478, at *2 (E.D.Pa. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:32 am
Plaintiff sued defendant for negligence in the design of a toaster that caught on fire, causing the death of the owner. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 9:19 am
In short, a court must: (1) be independent, (2) be impartial, and (3) afford defendants basic guarantees. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
Defenders of Wildlife, et al., v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
I, §9, cl. 2. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 10:00 am
Pandaloon, LLC, 2-21-cv-01323 (CDCA Apr. 7, 2022) (John W. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 4:57 am
See Beaudry, at 2-3. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 12:37 pm
The State does not argue harmless error but commendably acknowledges that Perez's probable testimony would have been important to the defendant's case. [read post]
