Search for: "Holmes"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 6,311
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
Holm (in 1932) to AIRC (2015).And for those wondering why “legislature” rather than the more capacious “state” might have been used in Article I, here is one explanation. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:19 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:44 pm
In the November 6, 2015 edition of the Law Times, personal injury lawyer Brian Goldfinger wrote an article entitled “Three Day Summary Judgment Mini Trial”. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Holm, in 1932, the Court upheld Minnesota law’s inclusion of the governor in the districting process through the power of the veto, holding that there is nothing in the federal Constitution that suggests “an attempt to endow the Legislature of the state with the power to enact laws in any manner other than that in which the Constitution of the state has provided that all laws shall be enacted. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
Writing for the Court, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said, “It is not open to question that this statute is constitutional …. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 2:43 am
By Alexandra Materia Tattoos place another wrinkle into the realm of copyright law and their interaction with the fair use defense. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm
Young Thug, a prominent rapper, is currently on trial in Atlanta, two years after being arrested for racketeering and gang-related charges. [read post]
19 May 2015, 12:54 pm
Hotelier Roadmap to EB-5 Financing for New Hotel Construction, Expansion or Renovation: Ten Steps to a Successful EB-5 Offering This article was first published in EB5 Investors Magazine. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:26 am
— Catherine DeBono Holmes This article is co-authored by Daniel B. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:30 am
If you're Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., you write an opinion for the Court explaining that (1) there's no double jeopardy problem because there could have been separate trials with differing verdicts so why not a single trial, and (2) anyway, who's to say that the jury didn't just decide to give Dunn a partial break by find him not guilty of the liquor charges.Consistency in the verdict is not necessary. [read post]
19 May 2015, 12:54 pm
Hotelier Roadmap to EB-5 Financing for New Hotel Construction, Expansion or Renovation: Ten Steps to a Successful EB-5 Offering This article was first published in EB5 Investors Magazine. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Makisi & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 355 Does the right to make oral submissions to a review officer on a s.202 Housing Act 1996 review, following a 'minded to' letter, mean that the applicant has the right to insist on a meeting? [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
30 Apr 2005, 6:41 pm
11/04/2005. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:57 am
(Randy Barnett) In my previous post, I explained how no one other than Chief Justice Roberts ever held the legal position that he came, for whatever reason, to hold. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:21 am
As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes explained in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 12:54 pm
Hotelier Roadmap to EB-5 Financing for New Hotel Construction, Expansion or Renovation: Ten Steps to a Successful EB-5 Offering This article was first published in EB5 Investors Magazine. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
Cardozo, and Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., who all lacked federal judicial experience but who had served with distinction on the highest courts of New Jersey, New York, and Massachusetts. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 3:30 pm
One of the most significant developments in U.S. antitrust law in years has come upon the horizon: the much criticized, nearly 100 year old rule holding that minimum resale price maintenance ("RPM") is per se illegal is in jeopardy. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 4:23 pm
.): Writing for himself and Justice Brandeis nearly a century ago, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes extolled what he viewed as a foundational tenet of freedom of expression in our country: "[I]f there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperatively calls for attachment than any other it is the principle of free thought—not free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate. [read post]
