Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 6,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2006, 7:54 am
Husband's expenditure of approximately $30,000 of marital funds to purchase car to restore with his son, which husband intended to gift to son upon completion of restoration, did not constitute dissipation of assets justifying award of $15,000 to former wife. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 4:27 pm
AB, we can't speculate who's involved, but it involves a high-profile sports figure who had an affair with another man's wife. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 9:52 am
Nothing actually, although the case of Higgins v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 9:50 am
Individually and on behalf of her husband's estate, his wife brought suit against numerous defendants under theories of strict liability and negligence for the death of her husband. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 9:17 pm
Saugestad, 2006 BCSC 1839, released on December 13, 2006, Madam Justice Russell considered a claim brought by a second wife to vary her husband's will, in which he left his estate to his two adult sons. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 11:40 am
Since the New Jersey divorce, the ex-wife's income had increased, but the judge only focused on the fact that the ex-husband's income had stayed about the same since the divorce, and it did not refer to Stamberg v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 7:33 am
According to the article, a family therapist "posed as his former wife's new husband and posted an ad on an Internet site for swingers, asking interested men to call the couple. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 3:43 pm
That being so, there was no rule which automatically exempted a 'wronged' husband from being gagged - even though his right to free speech might, on the right facts, be given priority.* Both CC's and N's privacy rights under ECHR Article 8 had to be taken into account. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 8:42 am
Despite the ex-husband's belated attempt to argue he was clinically depressed since his wife left him, he did not sign a certification to that effect, nor did he submit a physician's certification attesting to his depression. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 12:55 am
Denzik v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 1:28 pm
[Greg represented the wife in this case.] [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 10:30 am
Burg v. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 10:11 pm
The Supreme Court held, in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 6:59 am
The ex-husband moved to prohibit ex-wife's friend, Steven, from having any contact with the parties' two daughters. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 8:51 am
Burkle v. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 7:11 am
The Appellate Division rejects the wife's argument that her behavior did not constitute harassment. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 6:04 am
Grasso v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 10:07 am
The rapist's wife was to be given to the father "to be ravished . . .not to return her to her husband (but) to take her. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 1:53 am
In Kojovic v. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 11:38 am
In League v League, Docket No. 261058 decided by the Michigan Court of Appeals on October 19, 2006, the defendant husband argued, in essence, "The devil made me do it. [read post]
