Search for: "I. C. " Results 6121 - 6140 of 55,371
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2010, 10:12 pm by Simon Gibbs
Almost the kind of question I would expect a member of the judiciary reading this Blog to anonymously post. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 1:10 pm by Giles Peaker
” In C, C had Pre-Settled Status, she had come to the UK as a non-EU citizen, but was the dependant of her daughters, who were EU citizens. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 8:35 am by Michael Geist
  The decision included the following comment on Bill C-32's education exception: I am also aware that Bill C-32, An Act to amend the Copyright Act, 3rd Session, 40th Parliament, 59 Elizabeth II, 2010, section 21 would amend section 29 to state that "Fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright". [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:12 pm by becassidy
” Today in our weekly Monday Message from Dean Lee Fisher, he quoted a C|M|Law alumni on the concept of grit. [read post]
3 May 2010, 8:17 am by Al Nye
Face it, if the C's go down 0-2, this series is over. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 8:36 am
I see no reason why Indiana should be an outlier on this question, and the majority opinion does not undertake to provide a reason for placing us against the mainstream. * * * Justice Boehm's opinion thus swims upstream against both federal and Indiana authority about the meaning of "mistake of identity" by sweeping within Rule 15(c) any mistake, including legal bad calls about who among multiple possible defendants might be liable. * * * Rule 15(c) was… [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 3:41 am
Likewise, it is a useful precaution to close or otherwise terminate additional borrowing authority on any joint credit cards, lines of credit, or other joint debt accounts, when a divorce appears imminent SOURCE: Eric C. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 3:31 am by Orin Kerr
I don't think I have met Rushing, and I don't have any particular views about her nomination specifically. [read post]
18 May 2009, 12:21 pm
I'm always amazed when copyright owners flub the fairly simple requirements of 512(c)(3). [read post]