Search for: "J True" Results 6121 - 6140 of 7,753
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2010, 1:05 am by Illan Rua Wall
We must not forget the true meaning of the definition of the state as that which holds the ‘monopoly of violence’ in the territory. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 9:06 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Sept. 7, 2010, Wetzel, J.) which case involved claims against various tortfeasors along with underinsured motorist benefits and bad faith claims against the UIM carrier. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 1:21 pm by StephanieWestAllen
  As a result, he is one of the true heroes of the legal writing community. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am by INFORRM
   If a politician or a businessman is accused of being a crook we need to know whether that is true. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:45 pm by Matthew Hill
Finding for M on this point, Rix LJ expressed sympathy with K&C’s argument that the “true need was the underlying one of safety in managing [M’s] night-time toileting. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 5:25 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
(j) It may be true that a statutory amendment of a rather cognate provision, like Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code by the Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Act, 1999 does not and cannot cut down the ambit of High Court's power under Article 227. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 1:34 pm by George Lenard
The Supreme Court simply assumed that Green’s protests were a legitimate reason for not hiring him — provided they were the true reason. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 10:12 pm by emagraken
Justice McEwan noted that while this was true it could be remedied by resorting to the Court’s inherent jurisdiction. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:30 am by Mary Giorgi
And as the law developed, spurred by the Restatement (3d) of Torts: Products Liability during the 1990s, it became more and more clear that the law would tolerate true “strict” liability only in cases of manufacturing flaws. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Aspect of “good faith” or “legitimate expectations”[5.1] It is true that a number of communications were sent by the office - either from the examining division or the Board relating to the purported appeal. [5.2] Such communications are however of merely administrative nature and the existence thereof does not prejudge substantive examination of the facts of the case by the Board (T 781/04 [2] and T 781/04 [28]). [read post]