Search for: "Lowe v. State" Results 6121 - 6140 of 9,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 9:05 pm by Sabrina Minhas
Antitrust law can address one consequence of systemic racism—disproportionately low levels of wealth for Black people compared to other groups in the United States—better than antidiscrimination law, Davis and his coauthors explain. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am by INFORRM
Hay v Cresswell [2023] EWHC 882 (KB).Tattoo artist William Hay took libel action against Nina Cresswell, a woman who published a blog and social media posts stating that he had violently sexually assaulted her 10 years earlier. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am by INFORRM
The Sun’s reporting of Operation Elveden prosecutions and decisions has been remarkable even by the low standards of the British press. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by D. James Greiner
Supreme Court decision in Gideon v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:03 am by Roel van Woudenberg
With reference to figure 2, the description of the parent application at column 6, lines 37 to 41, explicitly indicates that the low temperature two-phase refrigerant is heated both by exchanging heat w [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 7:17 pm by Michael Lowe
Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc., 770 F.2d 399, 407 (4th Cir. 1985) and United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am by Kevin LaCroix
In a guest post below, Weil Gotshal attorneys Carangelo, Ferrillo and  Hannah Field-Lowes take an updated look at the rapidly changing global regulatory environment and the securities litigation implications. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot create standing:… [read post]