Search for: "M v. M" Results 6121 - 6140 of 53,959
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
I'm trying to figure out the incentive effects here.Obviously, with an increasingly conservative Court, the exclusionary rule has been cut back during the past couple of decades. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 7:58 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On 15 January 2019, the Venezuelan National Assembly announced that Mr Juan Gerardo Guaidó Márquez was the interim President of Venezuela. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
On 16 December 2021 Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of Spano v De Souza. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:25 am by Emma Kent
Recent case law Mr Justice Mostyn made comments in respect of transparency in two recent financial remedy case judgments reported in November 2021, BT v CU and A v M. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 12:30 am by JR Chaves
Quizá la esfinge de la Justicia debe tener los ojos vendados, pero no los ciudadanos que pueden ver lo que más pesa en la balanza de las sentencias, firmes o no. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:19 am by Giles Peaker
(Justin Bates as pro bono counsel for the appellant.) 6 Bellamy Close, London W14 9UT – Ref ((Housing) Act 2004 and Housing and Planning Act 2016 – Rent repayment orders) (2021) UKFTT LON_00AN_HMF_2020_0061 I’m leaving this FTT decision here as one to read for your own entertainment. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 9:03 am by Eric Goldman
While the court got this ruling right, I’m still flummoxed by the metatags ruling. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
I'm skeptical that the judicial process is likely to lead to reliable results in cases such as this. [1] Doe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:43 am by KLG PDF Import
Key Insight: Privileged docs based on only state law must be produced in a case with both federal and state claims Nature of Case: Medical malpractice Electronic Data Involved: Responsive documents Keywords: Privilege, state law Identified State Rule(s): K.S.A. section 65-4925(a) Identified Federal Rule(s): FRCP 26(b)   [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
The reliance on Ludgate House Litd v Ricketts (Valuation Officer) (2020) EWCA Civ 1637 (our note) was misplaced. [read post]