Search for: "Mark Wells "
Results 6121 - 6140
of 46,890
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2018, 4:26 am
We lack persuasive evidence showing, for example, that the East End of Houston has a sizable population, a well-known historical significance, is a popular tourist destination, or has a widely recognized reputation for some other reason. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:47 am
I’ve known Mark for years. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:51 am
Finally, Eleonora Rosati alerted readers to this year's online edition of the IP Law Summer School, including a special IPKat discount.Never Too Late 267 [Week ending May 31] 'XOXO' word mark cannot be registered as a trade mark, says EU General Court | Beef in veggieland: Hague court rules that INCREDIBLE BURGER infringes IMPOSSIBLE BURGER trade mark | No longer Merck-y - High Court determines issues remitted by Court of Appeal in Merck… [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:20 am
BBK, a seller of smoking-related products under the mark RAW, alleged that Central Coast infringed the RAW trademark by selling cannabis products under the mark RAW GARDEN. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:14 pm
Additional steps in the “Meet and Confer” process might include one party marking their direct, opposing then marking both counter and cross, and then the other party marking rebuttal designations. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:03 am
(criticised on this weblog here), in which the "7 for all mankind" mark was blocked by an earlier mark "Seven" as well as the contrasting French and |US treatments of the famous red soles of Louboutin shoes (on which see Katposts here and here). [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 3:28 am
" It asserted that due to its extensive policing efforts, the public never saw the phrase as a common slogan, and to the extent that it did, it no longer does.The Examining Attorney contended that the phrase is in widespread use as a political or social justice informational message, that "fits well on tshirts and protest signs. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 1:08 am
International Copyright Law returns to Londonon November 27 and 28.If you'd like to catch up on the last year of trade mark litigation or to just have a neat summary, check out Darren Meale's Retromark Volume II: the last six months in trade marks(and Volume I as well).The IPKat has been a very keen reader this week! [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 8:20 am
" The relevant consumers are doctors and the like, as well as consumers (ordinary and professional) who seek training in the identified fields. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 5:19 am
" On trade marks and designs, the UK IPO stated that"We recognise that for EU trade marks, users will want clarity over the long-term coverage of those rights. [read post]
On interpreting meaning from Nueces DA ouster and the limitations of reform via prosecutor elections
28 Aug 2016, 2:55 pm
" Here are the specific references to the Nueces County race:In February 2016 [sic], the incumbent District Attorney in Nueces County, Texas, Mark Skurka, lost his primary race to Mark Gonzales, a defense attorney who lacked prosecutorial experience and had “not guilty” tattooed across his chest; Gonzales had promised greater transparency and a crackdown on prosecutorial misconduct.Here's a bit more detail:In March 2016, in what local media called “a… [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 11:23 am
They are summarized below, with links to the pertinent TTABvue pages where the decisions may be found, as well as to the pertinent TTABlog postings, if any. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:54 am
Deceptive trademarks (unlike deceptively misdescriptive marks under Section 2(e)(1)) are not eligible for registration via Section 2(f) acquired distinctiveness.A mark is deceptively misdescriptive if it satisfies the first two prongs of the test set forth above. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:56 am
Like a quiverful of arrows striking their target, emails from almost every corner of the civilized world have been thudding into this Kat's email box to tell him all about the Washington Redskins' REDSKINS trade mark and this ruling by the US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) that the mark was "disparaging". [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 12:30 am
The next instalment of the Case of the Problem that Refuses to Be Solved is taken up by Katfriend Keith Gymer (Page Hargrave), who writes as follows: As is now well known, the CJEU ruling in IP TRANSLATOR stated that: An applicant for a national trade mark who uses all the general indications of a particular class heading of the Classification referred to in Article 1 of the Nice Agreement to identify the goods or services for which the protection of the trade mark… [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 7:21 pm
The attorney, based upon a belief that the "X" mark required clarification, added to the signature line the words "her mark" and then signed the decedent's name. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 4:45 am
Not only are these files not of record, but even if they were, it is well-settled that these sorts of consistency arguments are legally irrelevant. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:11 am
In this long-running battle over the mark CINGULAR for cell phones and related products, the Board bifurcated the issues so that it could first rule on whether opposer has standing to bring the proceeding. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 5:03 am
Trade mark-focused IPKat readers are well familiar with the SkyKick legal saga, which also included a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union [Katposts here]. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:01 am
The GC rejected the appeal, confirming the descriptive character of the mark ANDORRA. [read post]
