Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 6121 - 6140
of 21,692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2018, 5:54 am
In Tinker v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 4:05 am
, ‘”‘ Inc., 17 NY3d 369, 374, 375 [2011] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 12:26 am
Scrutinizer GmbH, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit, No. 18-1195, 13 September 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
Corpus of Supreme Court of the United States, a collection of all Supreme Court opinions in the United States Reports though the 2017 term (with the 2018 soon to be added). [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 3:24 am
Garan Services Corp. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:00 am
Harris (D-California) surrounding the 2015 Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:00 am
Harris (D-California) surrounding the 2015 Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 11:11 am
Matal v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 1:41 am
Therefore if a mark lacks distinctive character in all Member States, the mark can only be registered if it has acquired distinctive character in the whole of the European Union (Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM, C‑98/11 P, EU:C:2012:307, [61] and [63]).It does not necessarily follow that distinctive character needs to be proven in each Member State. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:37 pm
” (See Stamathis v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:58 am
And the Justice Department obtained another FARA conviction in May, in the case of United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm
Varsity Brands to patent review in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 7:17 am
In the case of Juanita Nichols v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 2:57 am
It states that the dotted lines are used to “merely depict placement of the mark” on the packing backer card. 37 C.F.R. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 6:42 pm
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 (U.S., June 27, 2018) (States and public-sector unions may not extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees: it is a violation of the First Amendment (overturning Abood v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm
Thus, not only would proponents of liberal constitutional change need to secure ratification from all states where she crossed the 40% mark – a group including states such as Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas – they also would have to pick up five states that voted more than three-to-two against Senator Clinton. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 12:14 pm
Israel v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 5:17 am
Gustafson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 5:03 am
" As the Supreme Court of the United States recognized in Carey [v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 2:00 am
Jensen v. [read post]
