Search for: "Matter of Robert T"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 10,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
Another prosecution attorney, Robert Swann, then marches through the usual voluntariness colloquy, with the usual JTF-GTMO witness. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 4:38 am
Birchfield was, of course, drunk as a skunk, as if that matters. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 9:24 pm
Chief Justice Roberts probably used it for kindling. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
Chief Justice John Roberts pushed back against Christian Vergonis, arguing on Himmelreich’s behalf, on these points, suggesting that he wasn’t persuaded by Himmelreich’s literal reading of Section 2680. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 12:11 pm
The new doctrine can be laughable, too--that doesn't matter, because we've been trained not to laugh. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 3:49 am
And Thomas also agrees with the dissent’s view that the plurality’s claim that the Cellmark report wasn’t introduced for the truth of the matter is pretty much bogus. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
Politics is politics: It “ain’t beanbag. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 6:48 am
On March 22, 2019, Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded his investigation of matters related to Russian attempts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and submitted his confidential report to me pursuant to Department of Justice regulations. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm
Robert Bone – Notice Failure and Defenses in Trademark Law Bone’s basic argument: Principal notice issue in TM is uncertainty about scope, and principal problem is chilling effects. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 11:01 am
As a general matter, constituents don’t have a right to be heard and Governor Bevin has no obligation to listen to everyone who wishes to speak to him. . . . [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
“See as president I could have declassified it….Now I can’t, you know, but this is still a secret. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 1:01 am
But the priority right now, so it is never a good idea to absolutely rule things -- rule things out no matter what. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 11:44 am
It’s a matter of what they want as their standard on this subject. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
Some conservatives, however, don’t believe the court is authorized to interpret liberty to protect these kinds of rights. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 11:09 am
” Special Counsel Robert Mueller has never flatly announced that this broad public contention is a lie. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:11 am
No matter, in my mind it’s really a question for the legal scholars anyway, isn’t it? [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Pretty much anything, no matter how righteous or risible. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:11 pm
They don't go away. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm
“In the end, we can’t do it, but if you did, don’t you think a prosecutor or any attorney would be very wary of having a juror who had been sued by one of the parties? [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 10:33 pm
Robert Flach, an unenrolled preparer, has done just that. [read post]
