Search for: "People v. Keys" Results 6121 - 6140 of 8,155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm by Shannon O'Hare
  1.4 The Bill contains a raft of emergency powers in five key areas, one of which is to ease the burden on frontline staff. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:30 pm by Rick
”  (In re Deshaun, supra, 148 Cal.App.4th at 1387, quoting People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:58 pm by Amy Howe
But there was one key difference:  there were no major surprises today. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical [2015] EWHC 2973 (Pat), decided on 22 October by Mr Justice Birss in the Patents Court, England and Wales, is a decidedly unbifurcated ruling, being a full-blooded infringement-and-invalidity action running to 243 paragraphs. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 10:20 pm
It’s very understandable and ultimately makes the key point. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Because the Constitution itself contains no definition of the key language, courts are forced to draw lines that are based on something other than original text. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 1:51 am by Florian Mueller
For the time being, my position is that surgical intervention is insufficient and powerful remedies are key, but it should be a key objective to get there without the nuclear option. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
As Graber correctly notes, it was common in British constitutionalism to claim that opponents were violating key provisions of a fixed constitution. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am by Rose Hughes
The case of Emson v Hozelock ([2020] EWCA Civ 871) considered whether a relatively technically simple invention was non-obvious in view of an obscure prior art document. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (IP finance), Technical assistance a key point of discussion at TRIPS Council: (Intellectual Property Watch), WIPO turmoil as new DG’s future comes under threat: (IAM), WIPO to host inter-regional forum to explore strategies to enhance development and service-orientation of IP offices: (WIPO), Controversy over lack of transparency and overreaching enforcement provisions in ACTA: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP)   Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands World… [read post]