Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 72,931
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2007, 10:10 am
The Supreme Court of California take on this issue today in People v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 9:39 am
In the 2008 case of Fisher v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 4:03 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 1:35 pm
People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:41 am
In addition to my new little discussion of Apprendi-land in the Columbia Law Review's sidebar (discussed here), today the California Supreme Court has lots of Apprendi talk in People v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 8:20 pm
People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 8:11 pm
People v. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 1:45 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 1:51 pm
People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 12:10 pm
People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:57 am
A recent legal blogpost flagged a ruling in a labor case published in the Supreme People’s Court’s case database: Su Qiao v. the Taian (Shandong) Municipal Communist Party Disciplinary Inspection Commission. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:02 pm
In People v Syville (_NY3d_, 2010 NY Slip Op 07249 [10/14/10])the Court of Appeals held that "[w]here an attorney has failed to comply with a timely request for the filing of a notice of appeal and the defendant alleges that the omission could not reasonably have been discovered within the one-year period, the time limit imposed in CPL 460.30 should not categorically bar an appellate court from considering that defendant's application to pursue an untimely appeal. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 6:12 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:45 am
The opinion is styled, Safeco Insurance Company of America v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:39 am
By Lane V. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 3:03 am
Frazier v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:59 am
[People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 8:19 pm
People v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 1:52 pm
By Lane V. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:45 pm
We just got back from visiting the Supreme Court, where we hung out with the (sizable and growing) crowd of people camped out at One First Street, so they can get seats in the courtroom for tomorrow's argument in the D.C. gun control case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
