Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 6121 - 6140 of 13,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2024, 2:29 pm by Rob Cohen
Because the employee was unable to find another position, he departed the United States and returned to his home in Mexico on Dec. 8, 2022. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
Petitions Granted: Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 10:00 am by Ken Chan
Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 10:00 am by Ken Chan
Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The plaintiff [Petitioner] in this action was initially employed by the City of Lockport [Lockport] in a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees [AFSCME]. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The plaintiff [Petitioner] in this action was initially employed by the City of Lockport [Lockport] in a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees [AFSCME]. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:01 am
I believe the State fell asleep at the switch here, and that the delay in setting a trial date for Penwell after the United States Supreme Court denied her petition for certiorari is chargeable to the State.In Ralph Belvedere v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:49 am
Whether the Military Commissions Act of 2006 validly stripped federal court jurisdiction over habeas corpus petitions filed by foreign citizens imprisoned indefinitely at the United States Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay.2. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:56 pm by Javier Dominguez
SuperValu Inc. et al., case number 21-1326, all before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:24 am by Court C. VanTassell
ARCO petitioned for certiorari, contending that state law claims for further cleanup were preempted by CERCLA and that the cleanup proposed by the landowners could conflict with the remedial action plan selected by the EPA. [read post]