Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 6121 - 6140
of 9,854
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:14 am
This is an ongoing battle in the United States and abroad, and the FDA will continue its criminal law enforcement and regulatory efforts,” said John Roth, director of the FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigations. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:54 pm
The case, Doyle Randall Paroline v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:54 pm
The case, Doyle Randall Paroline v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:54 pm
The case, Doyle Randall Paroline v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:19 am
In 1965, efforts to suppress the votes of minorities, particularly in the South, led the United States Congress to pass the historic Voting Rights Act (VRA), which has, for generations, been used to ensure that elections are free, fair, and accessible to all eligible voters. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am
Muskrat v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:58 am
Madison — as quoted in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
Alternatively, sovereign immunity applies to Plaintiff’s nonconstitutional claims, as the Westfall Act provides that the United States is the proper defendant for these claims and the Government has not waived sovereign immunity here. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
Alternatively, sovereign immunity applies to Plaintiff’s nonconstitutional claims, as the Westfall Act provides that the United States is the proper defendant for these claims and the Government has not waived sovereign immunity here. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
To the surprise of no one who has been paying attention, the June 26, 2013 United States Supreme Court opinions in the cases of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:02 am
I realize that to most people it's not even the fifth-most-interesting case decided this week, but I was particularly surprised and pleased to see Chief Justice Roberts's concurrence on Monday in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:58 pm
Indeed, as Justice Scalia suggested, in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
The judgment orders the United States to pay money that it would not disburse but for the court’s order. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:27 pm
United States, 570 U. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:18 pm
Breyer, Supreme Court, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
UPDATED ON JUNE 26, 2013: In a landmark decision penned by Justice Kennedy, in which Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined (Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito dissenting), the United States Supreme Court held that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional as a violation of equal protection pursuant to the Fifth Amendment in the case United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1879) the Court explained states’ interests in regulating marriage with the simple declaration: “Upon [marriage] society may be said to be built. [read post]
