Search for: "ROBINSON" Results 6121 - 6140 of 9,697
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2012, 12:35 pm by David Kravets
Noce ruled: (.pdf) Here, installation of the GPS tracker device onto defendant Robinson’s Cavalier was not a ‘search’ because defendant Robinson did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the exterior of his Cavalier. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm by Zoe Tillman
Robinson found that Thomas failed to offer any authority as to why public access to the document should be restricted. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:49 pm by Eric
Eric Robinson explains why the judge got to the right legal result. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:45 pm by Jeff Gamso
  But I'm not one of those people who went to law school (or into criminal law) inspired by the vision of Atticus Finch.But his figure lurks.Not so much as a model of how to do law - I once attended CLE session built around how really awful his representation of Tom Robinson was. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:37 pm by Glenn Reynolds
As Judge Spotswood Robinson used to say to lawyers in trouble, “what’s your next argument? [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:09 pm by Orin Kerr
Robinson, that allows a full search of the person, which I would think would include checking out whether a suspect has hidden drugs or a gun on their body. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:50 am by Andrew Frisch
Oct.9, 2007) (requiring that late opt-in plaintiffs show good cause for their untimely consent filings), Robinson–Smith v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:33 am by Monté T. Squire
No. 07-272-SLR, Judge Robinson denied the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of a prior decision granting in part defendant’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 8:20 am by James L. Higgins
Dec. 22, 2011), discussed previously here, Judge Robinson denied a defendant’s motion to sever or stay the litigation against it in a situation where the defendant argued that, unlike its co-defendant, it never had (and never would) commercialize the technology accused of infringement, and where there existed no allegation that its activities or products overlapped with its co-defendant to satisfy the “common transaction” requirement of FRCP 20(a). [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 8:01 am by Deven Desai
Here, I am drawing on a paper written by David Robinson, Harlan Yu, William Zeller, and Ed Felten, called Government Data and the Invisible Hand. [read post]