Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 7,646
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
In that respect, as was explained in a previous post, the in the recent case of Schalk and Kopf v Austria, the European Court of Human Rights decided that at this point in time, Article 12 does not require States to allow same-sex marriage. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:52 am
United States (10-5296) and Vazquez v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:12 am
These same unions may need to decide whether, in the event of continuing protests, to forcibly remove "agitators" and round up Democratic state senators. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:11 am
These same unions may need to decide whether, in the event of continuing protests, to forcibly remove “agitators” and round up Democratic state senators. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In particular, in deciding that a class action was not maintainable, the Court took into account the increasing concern of courts round the world about protecting freedom of expression in a defamation context. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:57 am
Since sashimi is traditionally priced higher than nigiri, the restaurant’s policy for the sushi buffet requires diners to clean their plates completely in order to receive the next round of food. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
” In today’s second case, United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 3:54 am
In the 2nd District’s opinion in State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:43 am
" "Article V [Criminal Justice] - Don't Cut Programs That Save Money"Another document calculates "The Cost of Mental Health Cuts in Harris County," recalling that after the last major round or state cutbacks in 2003 (the 78th Legislature), "persons with severe mental illness who couldn't access services and medications soon destabilized and overwhelmed emergency rooms, law enforcement, county jails and state mental… [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:04 am
This Article, in contrast, argues that pursuant to the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:38 am
At her Court Beat blog, Joan Biskupic discusses Snyder v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:22 am
The next round of the battle between the State and those who build houses in breach of planning controls is scheduled to be heard in the case of Welwyn Hatfield Council v the Secretary of State in the Supreme Court on 7 February 2011. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:52 am
The article contains beautiful illustrations of "natural law" v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
" Pucci v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 10:39 am
McCoy v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 4:08 am
” In United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:50 am
Padilla, have raised it on the first go ’round. [read post]
