Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 6121 - 6140 of 41,390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am by Andree Blumstein
Andrée Sophia Blumstein is the solicitor general of Tennessee, which joined an amicus brief with 19 other states in support of the challenger in Janus v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Lui: Because the case involves the state's soveriegn powers it's the same as the criminal cases. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:18 am by david
The Supreme Court today granted a writ of certiorari in Arizona et al. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:13 am by Lyle Denniston
  If, as many signs indicated, the Court winds up splitting four to four in Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:43 am by Michael Geist
  State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. is contesting the constitutional validity of Canada's private sector privacy legislation (PIPEDA), arguing it oversteps the federal government's jurisdictional power. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm by Michael Dimino
On November 30, the Court will hear oral argument in Setser v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:57 am
I basis for Congress’s action in the Jerusalem passport case, Zivotofsky v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 9:56 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
 Vidya Drolia v Durga Trading Corporation is an interesting and important decision of a three judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India on arbitrability in Indian arbitration and the allocation of powers between the court and the arbitral tribunal to decide questions relating to arbitrability, especially in the context of Section 8 (where the court refers a dispute covered by an arbitration agreement to arbitration) and Section 11 (power of the supervisory court to… [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 2:32 pm by Unknown
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (Navajo–Hopi Settlement Act; Administrative Procedure Act) United States of America v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 2:09 am
Governor, it is “only when a legal, not a mere political, issue arises touching upon the existence or extent of a legal right that Article 131 is attracted” (citing State of Rajasthan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 4:14 pm by Mark Murakami
  That case held that:  the states have no power, by taxation or otherwise, to retard, impede, burden, or in any manner control, the operations of the constitutional laws enacted by congress to carry into execution the powers vested in the general government. [read post]