Search for: "State v. Greene" Results 6121 - 6140 of 6,666
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
(IP Spotlight) (Excess copyright) (Patent Docs) (Spicy IP) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) CAFC greatly limits software and business method patents: In re Bilksi (IP Law Observer) (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (IP Spotlight) (The Prior Art) (Patent Baristas) (EFF) (Patent Prospector) (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IP Updates) (Daily Dose of IP) (PLI) (Green… [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:18 pm
Fresh-cut leafy greens are usually pre-washed with a disinfectant (e.g., chlorine) and are packaged, sometimes in a modified atmosphere (reduced oxygen) to preserve the food quality. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege waived? [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 8:00 pm
A few weeks ago I wrote about the Supreme Court's Quanta v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 8:03 am
Green, Delegation and Accountability in the Clean Development Mechanism: The New Authority of Non-State ActorsEugene C. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
§ § 1961-68, plaintiffs-appellants Chaz Concrete Co., LLC, Grant Trucking, Inc., Green River Seed and Sod, Inc., and Sweeney Enterprises, Inc. 1 No. 07-5870 Chaz Concrete Co., et al. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:29 pm
 In my opinion it is stated briefly and accurately in the following passage in the judgment of Aylesworth J.A., concurred in by Robertson C.J.O., in  Woodward v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:19 pm
Green, 4072, 4756/06, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2008 NY Slip Op 6925; 54 A.D.3d 603; 863 N.Y.S.2d 437; 2008 N.Y. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 4:34 am
By way of example, there is already OHIM case law relating to designs used on toy cars as opposed to real cars (Supermarked A/S v Ferrari SPA, ICD 842, 13 November 2006), as well as a decision of the Court of Appeal of England & Wales relating to a design that can function as both a laundry aid, and a massage device (Green Lane Products Ltd v PMS International Group Plc & Ors [2008] EWCA 358). [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:43 am
Johnson, 491 U.S. 197 (1989), and United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]