Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 8,251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2011, 5:20 am
(See, among a zillion examples, anti-miscegenation laws after Loving v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:47 pm
Holder, but their unwillingness to give Congress two months to enact enforcement legislation in Leal Garcia. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA and others v eBay International AG and others. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:21 am
Pharmacia & Upjohn in liquidazione and Pfizer Italia s.r.l (Kluwer Patent Blog) US: IPO releases list of top 300 patent holders for 2010 (Patent Docs) US: Supreme Court to hear more patent cases in October 2011 term: Mayo v Prometheus; Kappos v Hyatt; Caraco v Novo Nordisk (Inventive Step) US: In pleading inequitable conduct, inventor’s citation to withheld reference does not establish knowledge of reference sufficient to satisfy FRCP 9(b): Fred… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:30 am
The court further stated that given the absence of a fairness opinion, the special committee “could not responsibly make a recommendation based on its personal assessment of the likely direction of the trading multiples pertaining to the class A shares. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:05 am
The suit arose after Comerica Bank denied the redemption of three CDs purchased in 1980 through 1982 by Thelma DeGoede from Industrial State Bank & Trust, which Comerica Bank acquired in November 1992. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:41 pm
This was the situation in State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:04 am
Durham had been appointed by Attorney General Eric Holder in August 2009 to initially review nearly a dozen cases of alleged detainee mistreatment. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:46 am
by Natali Helberger For years, consumer representatives, citizen rights groups and academics have lobbied for a better balance between the interests of rights holders and consumers in copyright law. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:10 am
The purpose or ratio essendi of the levy is to compensate right-holders for damage suffered by the private copying of protected works. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:40 am
In Inman v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:31 am
Essentially, a trademark gives a holder the right to prevent others from using the same mark where there is a likelihood of confusion as to source. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:43 pm
For example, in CCH the Supreme Court of Canada stated: The fair dealing exception, like other exceptions in the Copyright Act, is a user’s right. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 9:03 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:13 pm
EVELYN NYE v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:14 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Cohen v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
Holder, 10-920, and Gor v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:58 pm
Broadly stated, he does not view minors as holders of rights, and puts a lot of stake in parents (specifically a “nuclear family”) to protect the interests of the child. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 6:06 am
A common misconception shared by many of our clients is that in order to have a trademark they must have a registration with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
("ACI") appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
