Search for: "State v. Seven"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 11,120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2014, 2:36 am
Katzman v. [read post]
4 May 2014, 9:30 pm
Moreover, our approach undermines enduring dicta in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 1:06 pm
State v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 1:02 pm
Moss, Plumhoff v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:29 am
Thus, in Virginia State Bd. of Pharmacy v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 3:30 pm
Amant v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:29 am
It requires at least twenty-seven “upwind” states to reduce power-plant emissions of pollutants that harm the air quality in “downwind” states. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:48 am
“The ULA monopoly has led to murky contracts, reliance on Russian suppliers, and spiraling costs,” the document states. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:14 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:14 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:07 pm
However, no such provision was made regarding any of the other seven categories of exemptions in Public Officers Law 87 (2). [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:34 am
Penal Law 220.03 states that a defendant is guilty of Possession Seven when he “knowingly and unlawfully possess a controlled substance. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 12:09 pm
On February 27,2014, Judge Romero handed down his decision in the case of Lopez v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:43 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:47 am
The judge refused to allow the former employee to file a second amended complaint and also declined to exercise jurisdiction over the former employee’s state law claims (Segarra v Federal Reserve Bank of New York, April 23, 2014, Abrams). [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:01 am
, Taxes and Priorities, R.I.P., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:35 am
Heath Abshure, president of the North American Securities Administrators Association, an organization of state securities regulators. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:21 am
In addition, named plaintiff Ellis would be able to seek, unopposed, a $5,000 service award, while the seven other named plaintiffs would be permitted to pursue unopposed $1,000-service awards. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm
., the Court will hear a state case, Riley v. [read post]
