Search for: "United States v. Place"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 24,118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2008, 8:04 am
Jennifer Roth, former ADO and current Shawnee County PD, won in State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 2:49 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:52 pm
United Mktg. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 9:23 am
The United States was among the few nations to fail and dramatically regress. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 9:23 am
The United States was among the few nations to fail and dramatically regress. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 12:57 pm
A more recent example might be United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:51 pm
I predict, as I have for several years, that states currently banning same-sex marriage will change course when they are required to recognize the validity of same-sex marriages performed in other states, via Article IV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution, also known as the Full Faith and Credit Clause. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:28 am
However, until last year’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 4:09 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:43 am
Moreover, the Court found that the Husband had substantial resources and frequently traveled to the United States, therefore did not show that it would be a hardship for him to travel to New Jersey to litigate this matter. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
” State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:58 pm
It’s small, in light of his other issues, but Donald Trump is once again embroiled in litigation, albeit outside of the United States, which may result in findings against him of at least negligent misrepresentation sufficient to produce personal liability: see Singh v Trump et al, 2016 ONCA 747 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gv3z7>. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 12:43 pm
This case ended up in federal court in the first place, because—after the plaintiffs initially filed in state court—the state of Texas removed the case to federal court under 28 U.S. [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 4:36 pm
United Prop. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm
Section 1182 defines the pool of individuals who are admissible to the United States. . . . [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:31 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 8:07 am
In Souratgar v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 7:24 pm
The parties' briefs are available here; the brief of the United States is available here. [read post]
21 May 2015, 6:00 am
Those who perform work outside of a nation-state may not be eligible A recent DC Circuit Appeals Court decision, Rogers v. [read post]
