Search for: "Williams v. United States"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 6,553
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2008, 3:47 pm
United States Fid. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 12:57 pm
The cost to Philip Morris of trying to slant jury instructions too far in its favor -- $79.5 million in punitive damages: As I first noted in this post from this morning, today the Supreme Court of Oregon issued its ruling, on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, in Williams v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 8:01 pm
See United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 2:15 pm
Williams - the United States Supreme Court's most recent foray into punitive damages litigation - has once again raised procedural and substantive due process matters regarding fairness to defendants and reawakened debate in this area. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:48 pm
By Jeffrey Rosen April 2005 Even liberals may come to regard William Rehnquist as one of the most successful chief justices of the century [www.theatlantic.com] The Day After Roe By Jeffrey Rosen (June 2006) If the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:45 am
HEPPT, ESQ., 05 Civ. 9977 (RWS) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK January 16, 2008, Filed , the tide seems to be turning in favor of the defendant attorney. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 10:11 am
Medellin was born in Mexico, he lived most of his life in the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Lopez-DeLeon, No. 06-41553 A sentence for illegal reentry is affirmed where defendant's prior California conviction for sexual intercourse with a minor qualified as a "crime of violence" within section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, as documents established that the victim in that matter was under the age of 14. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 10:23 am
SPEEDY TRIALUnited States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 10:15 am
Readers of this blog are no doubt aware of the United States Supreme Court's decision, roughly one year ago, in Philip Morris v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 10:00 am
On Monday, January 14, 2008, the Supreme Court issued an Order inviting the Solicitor General of the United States to file a brief expressing the views of the United States Government in Progress Energy, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
Varden et al filed 04/24/07 closed 12/13/07 1:07-cv-02382 William Reber, L.L.C. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:36 am
Source: New York State Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), January 15, 2007
For your information we are posting the entire New York Legislature 2007 Chapter Law List as retrieved from the New York Legislative Retrieval System on January 15, 2008. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 3:24 am
Attorney for the State: Joby Jerrells, Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Brenwick Associates, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
To take the best-known precedent, after World War II the United States prosecuted German government lawyers in the second round of Nuremberg trials. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 7:01 am
William Hamilton Office of the Medical Examiner, Eighth District 606 SW 3rd Ave. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 2:37 am
It should be read from cover to cover by everyone who is interested in the scope of copyright law in the United States. [read post]
