Search for: "Young v. Young"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 12,485
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2010, 9:31 am
” Young v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:48 am
Supreme Court and Gentry v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
” Young v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the libel appeal of Stocker v Stocker ([2019] UKSC 17). [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:28 am
Arbino v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
Corp., 26 AD3d 372, 810 NYS2d 484 [2d Dept 2006]; Lewin v County of Suffolk, 18 AD3d 621, 795 NYS2d 659 [2d Dept 2005]).Under the Frye standard, the burden of proving general acceptance rests upon the party offering disputed expert testimony (Cumberbatch v Blanchette, 35 AD3d 341, 825 NYS2d 744 [2d Dept 2006]; Zito v Zabarsky, 28 AD3d 42, 812 NYS2d 535 [2d Dept 2006]). [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:25 pm
(Neomi Rao) Commentators on Windsor v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:20 am
Reference was also made to Keenan v United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR 38, where inadequate medical records, lack of recourse to specialist psychiatric input, segregation and punishment were found to amount to degrading treatment in respect of a mentally ill person. [read post]
16 May 2021, 9:56 am
In terms of what would be a “reasonable adjustment” he mentioned exempting adapted properties from the policy so that they would not automatically be offered to households with young children, or awarding preference for adapted properties to disabled households. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 6:26 pm
Mork v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:12 pm
Wyeth v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 4:03 pm
Supreme Court case (Safford Unified School District v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
He strongly suggested that it was someone who opposed the opinion and wanted to pressure the justices not to go forward with the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:52 am
In Young v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:12 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 7:13 pm
See Apodaca v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 5:30 pm
Feds – Denver lawyer Jack Luellen of Fox Rothschild on the firm’s blog, Energy Law Today Breaking News: Executive Order Signed Relating to “Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities” – Boston lawyer Cynthia LaRose of Mintz Levin on the firm’s blog, Privacy & Security Matters What Connecticut Employers Need To Know About Young v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 6:07 am
V. [read post]
25 Oct 2024, 3:31 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
