Search for: "Beare v. State" Results 6141 - 6160 of 15,039
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2016, 12:44 pm by Elijah Yip
Related articles Court Benchslaps Trade Secret Plaintiff and Counsel For Bad Faith Litigation – RBC Bearings v. [read post]
21 May 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Nevertheless, such a philosophy did not always coincide with conservative interests, as when Burger led the court in the unanimous decision United States v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
California’s petition asks whether the rule is an adequate state law ground and whether the state (as in the Ninth and Tenth Circuits) or the habeas petitioner (as in the Fifth Circuit) bears the burden of persuasion as to adequacy. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:29 pm by Nora Ellingsen
Rushforth then turns to Judge Waits’ relationship with Fred Taylor, who was previously part of the United States v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:37 am
 The AmeriKat plainly has not read all 386 pages of the decision in detail, so imagines that there will be a wealth of further analysis on the decision to come and its bearing on trade mark law and principles. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:06 am by David Markus
Leon’s 46-page ruling in United States District Court in Washington reopens the district’s long fight over how much room the Second Amendment’s guarantee of the right to bear arms leaves for local regulation — and whether it applies only to firearms in the home, or to guns carried outside as well.The law gave the police the discretion to grant concealed-carry licenses only to those with “good reason to fear injury” or other specific reasons, such… [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:20 am
IntroductionThe Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea (“SCPNG”)’s recent decision in Namah v Pato [2016] PGSC 13; SC1497 (“Namah”) found the detention of asylum seekers (transferred from Australia to Papua New Guinea [“PNG”]) in a ‘regional processing centre’ on Manus Island to be ‘unconstitutional and illegal’. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:34 pm
In 2007, Mr Justice Pumfrey tried to do away with disclosure on obviousness in Nichia v Argos. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:43 am by Eugene Volokh
(stating that as used in the Second Amendment, the phrase to “bear arms” means to “wear, bear, or carry [arms] upon the person or in the clothing or in a pocket, for the purpose of being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person” (quoting Muscarello v. [read post]