Search for: "Child v. Child" Results 6141 - 6160 of 31,294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2011, 12:02 pm by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) Center for American Progress:Nearly 100 years ago, the Supreme Court declared federal child labor laws unconstitutional in a case called Hammer v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:06 pm by Steve
Today, the Virginia Supreme Court decided in Wyatt v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:48 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MM and AO (A Child), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 668 (18 May 2012) Maswaku v Westminster City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 669 (18 May 2012) El Goure v The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea [2012] EWCA Civ 670 (18 May 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Wolman v Weller [2012] EWHC 1292 (QB) (18 May 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Humber Oil… [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 6:00 am by AstuteLegalVideos.com
Supreme Court orders new trial for man convicted of sexual assault on a child | Burlington Free Press | The case is State v Abdi. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 6:03 pm
A recent example of application of the above principles, took place in Felty v. [read post]
28 May 2007, 7:51 am
This case was decided a few years ago, but it was a major turning point in Georgia law on relocation: Bodne v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 7:42 pm
In an action for tuition reimbursement under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), summary judgment for defendant department of education is affirmed where: 1) because the IDEA does not require that an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) name a specific school placement, plaintiff-child’s IEP was not procedurally deficient; and 2) there was substantial evidence [...] [read post]
18 May 2011, 8:59 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Werdin appeals from a judgment, entered upon a jury verdict, convicting him of forty-two[1] counts of possession of child pornography and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 11:25 am by Sandy
While caseworkers who allegedly wrongfully remove a child from his home are not entitled to absolute immunity for their actions, the Second Circuit has asserted that they are entitled to qualified immunity, and upheld the ruling of a District Court (while disagreeing with it on the absolute immunity issue), dismissing an action for wrongul removal of a child.The decision in Cornejo v. [read post]