Search for: "Childs v. State"
Results 6141 - 6160
of 21,041
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2022, 6:43 am
Entities exempted from the Act include (i) agencies, commissions, districts, etc. of the state or political subdivisions, (ii) nonprofits, (iii) higher education, (iv) national securities associations, (v) financial institutions or data subject to Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), and (vi) hospitals as defined under Connecticut law. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:14 am
Schafer v Astrue (4th Cir 2011) 641 F3d 49. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:10 am
Holmes v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:57 pm
The Wall Street Journal is running an excellent editorial discussing United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:52 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act) State of Oklahoma v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Tallent v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 9:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:56 pm
S (A Child), R (on the application of) v Plymouth City Council [2009] EWHC 1499 (Admin) Not sure how we missed this one and thanks to the Legal Action housing updates for the elbow to the ribs. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 9:50 am
The cases are Smith v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 2:54 pm
Zaunbrecher (Tribal Sovereign Immunity) and granted in Patchak v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:18 am
V. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 10:55 am
We also hold that the district court did not violate the Supreme Court’s rule in Darby v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 1:44 am
See Troxel v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:40 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 9:22 am
The case, Jamal Wright et al. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
What about the definitions of “parent” and “child”? [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:16 am
Div. 2003) (in action to terminate parental rights, court exercises jurisdiction over a mother who remained in Haiti based on contact with DYFS, the State’s concern for child’s welfare, and mother’s request that child remain in New Jersey); Ali v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
But in concluding that the nation's "evolving standards of decency" commanded that ruling, the court relied in part on the incorrect belief that only six states authorize the death penalty for the rape of a child. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:48 am
See, for example, R v. [read post]
