Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V"
Results 6141 - 6160
of 12,298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2015, 6:10 am
Justice Alito filed a separate opinion concurring in the judgment and Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part (EEOC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:19 am
Merely because the Defendants may be able to obtain certain information from other sources does not render the subpoena unnecessary. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 4:24 pm
This principle does not cause any astonishment but was plainly important to rehearse. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:36 pm
Sullivan then left the bus, went toward its rear, and continued to observe the defendant through the window. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:34 am
I do whatever I think is right. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:42 am
There, they clicked through several more sexually-explicit images involving minors. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:37 am
(See Virginia v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
I have to reveal some truth. [read post]
29 May 2015, 1:36 am
As the court stated, reiterating Lord Justice Oliver in Anheuser-Buch v Budejovicky Budvar NP, that goodwill is very much "localized" and that "...reputation which may, no doubt, and frequently does, exist without any supporting local business… does not by itself constitute a property which the law protects". [read post]
28 May 2015, 1:38 pm
A: Bill Graham, Warren v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 8:47 am
Does that count? [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:30 am
(Compare NAM v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:43 pm
If they can, the burden shifts back to the plaintiff to account for the information or to provide a loss-causation model that does not suffer the same problem. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:56 pm
Occasionally, I've frustrated by the fact that I find information on an officer's pending "separation" from his job for serious misconduct or a pending internal affairs investigation and I disclose it to the prosecutor and they tell me that they do not consider it Brady and are not distributing it to the Public Defender's Office or to private criminal defense attorneys with open cases involving that same officer.Instead of getting… [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:56 pm
Occasionally, I've frustrated by the fact that I find information on an officer's pending "separation" from his job for serious misconduct or a pending internal affairs investigation and I disclose it to the prosecutor and they tell me that they do not consider it Brady and are not distributing it to the Public Defender's Office or to private criminal defense attorneys with open cases involving that same officer.Instead of getting… [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:15 am
Burrage v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 8:03 pm
In a rather scathing decision in Hurst v. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:29 am
In 2013, another opinion was issued in regard to judges and social media in New York that I have not yet written about. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:01 pm
As I have written in law review [read post]
