Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General"
Results 6141 - 6160
of 21,002
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, Jan. 30 at 10:00 a.m.: The Brookings Institution will hold A discussion on the 2019 Missile Defense Review featuring a keynote address from Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy, Plans, and Capabilities James H. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:25 pm
In a matter of first impression under the DTSA, the Fifth Circuit held that a dismissal without prejudice of a DTSA case does not support an award of prevailing party attorney’s fees. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 10:17 am
See generally Nissan Motor Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
Aside from my usual admonishment to consult with an experienced construction attorney and do so early in the contracting process, my big take away is to draft your indemnification provisions carefully so as to meet the terms of Uniwest, particularly in the case of contracting with a state entity that does not have the same “limitations” on its time for suit as you do. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Clancy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 3:59 am
Canada (Attorney General), 2019 SCC 1 (36645) A.G. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 3:01 am
In 2017, the Attorney General of the Federation, based on an executive order signed by the President, applied to the Federal High Court to outlaw the activities of IPOB in Nigeria as ‘an act of terrorism’. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 9:28 am
Case citation: Glassdoor, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 11:13 pm
The court also found the airline liable for waiting time penalties under Labor Code section 203 and awarded derivative penalties under California’s Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”). [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 12:41 pm
Texas DOT v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 11:45 am
Assn. of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
M.H. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
M.H. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
M.H. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 3:00 am
Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:25 am
The court cited Nava v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:33 pm
In particular, the GC held that a ban on sales over a particular online platform does not constitute a hardcore restriction under EU competition law. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
Lee v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
A provincial or federal attorney general can have less impact on the quality of justice produced by the justice system than can Canada’s law societies. [read post]
