Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6141 - 6160
of 7,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am
Code, entitled “Assistance to foreign and international tribunals and to litigants before such tribunals,” is, in Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s words in Intel v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:49 pm
The case is Ashcroft v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
These have important long-term implications for the international defense strategies of the United States and other Western democracies. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:07 pm
The essay appears below (original Spanish along with my English translation). [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:24 am
Article 31(1) VCLT states that "A treaty shall be interpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in their context and in the light of its object and purpose. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:13 pm
This can no longer be allowed in view of the comments in Bovemij Verzekeringen NV v Benelux Merkenbureau, Case C-108/05 [EUROPOLIS], which makes clear that the mark must be distinctive in the whole of the territory of the member state [Merpel would like a little clarification here: is this what Bovemij clearly established?]. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
Salmond and MacAskill were roundly condemned for their remarks, being accused of anti-Englishness and, more seriously, of threatening judicial independence and undermining the rule of law. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:48 am
Enclosed is an English language and a Chinese language version of the FCPA manual. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
See for example Syndicat Northcrest v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
> 10th Cir.o o Refusal to take lessons to improve English did not cause dischargeZokari v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
” But elsewhere, he recognized that English courts frequently enjoined publications that infringed on copyright. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Michael Mabry stated the following in his declaration: “We havenever been contacted by Aurora nor [sic] any of its agents in person, by telephone or byfirst class mail to explore options for us to avoid foreclosure as required in CC § 2923.5. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:30 pm
In Clinton v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 9:28 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
; Boston.com; Connecticut Employment BlogMartin v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:46 am
Roche v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Antigua & Barbuda The country’s Defamation Act of 2015 is being positioned to serve as a model for the rest of the English-speaking Caribbean. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
JG Club Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
