Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 6141 - 6160
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2022, 4:58 am
In Grace v Law, the Court of Appeals held “that prior to commencing a legal malpractice action, a party who is likely to succeed on appeal of the underlying action should be required to press an appeal. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 12:47 pm
Today the Court of Appeal decides the fate of $331 million held by the State of California. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 11:04 am
The state courts in Florida held that the boy was not in detention, because he was free to leave. [read post]
3 May 2023, 2:20 am
The judgment The Court held that Mr Ossewaarde’s conviction for failing to comply with the new legal requirements applicable to missionary activities had been a breach of Article 9 [38]. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:35 am
XpertUniverse, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 5:56 am
For national banks in Connecticut (and indeed in other states), the decision is worth a review to determine if it applies.In Ramanathan v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:56 am
This statute does not apply to the immunity of individual foreign officials, however, as Court recently held in Yousuf v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:00 am
Rakofsky v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:41 am
In Sotelo v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
It held, in the end, that the doctrine did not apply to foreign judicial acts. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Hopkins v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:08 am
On Monday, SCOTUSblog will kick off an online symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 2:08 pm
The Tribunal held that the issues raised by the Slovak Republic concern the merits of the case and no provision of EU law actually prohibits investor-state arbitration. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:46 pm
In Darby v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 2:03 pm
Today, in Brown v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 2:42 am
On November 27, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that failure to warn claims directed at generic pharmaceutical manufacturers are not preempted by federal law.In Mensing v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
Today's case brief is Nelson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 7:33 am
He reminds us that our favorite Supreme Court cases dealing with navigability -- United States v. [read post]
Australian Federal Court Backs India on Sovereign Immunity: Another Twist in the Devas v. India Saga
3 Apr 2025, 4:32 am
In deciding whether India has waived its immunity, the Primary judge invoked the judgement of the High Court of Australia (“High Court) in Kingdom of Spain v Infrastructure Services (“Spain v. [read post]
