Search for: "Jonathan"
Results 6141 - 6160
of 26,100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2020, 2:02 pm
[In a brief exchange during a recent oral argument, the Justice suggested the Court should reconsider giving states "special solicitude" under Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:36 am
George Washington University professor Jonathan Turley was one of the few willing to say Sullivan’s move could “could create a threat of a judicial charge even when prosecutors agree with defendants. [read post]
15 May 2020, 6:00 am
Jonathan Gienapp, Constitutional Conflict (Almost) All the Way Down5. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:30 am
Jonathan R. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:15 pm
[We submitted another strange bedfellows amicus brief on severability in the Texas ACA case.] [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:12 am
If you are charged with committing or attempting to commit a sex crime, the experienced New Jersey sex crime defense attorneys of The Law Offices of Jonathan F. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:54 am
Marimow and Jonathan O’Connell of The Washington Post have this report. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:46 am
Khanna, CNNForget Pelosi's Boondoggle Bill--Take Taxes to Zero Instead Steve Cortes, RCPTrump's 'I'm Rubber, You're Glue' Campaign Plan Peter Nicholas, The AtlanticTrump's Odds of Winning Are Higher Than You Think Eric Levitz, New York MagazineStephanopoulos Just Wants the Tara Reade Story to Go Away John Nolte, BreitbartBiden Campaign Relies on Dem Women Amid Tara Reade Scrutiny Li Zhou, VoxDNI Richard Grenell Deserves the Nation's Gratitude Gina Loudon,… [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:13 am
Supreme Court decision on jury unanimity),; from Jonathan: (The Hard Thing About Hard Things by Ben Horowitz). [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:53 am
Jonathan Lipson (top, right) and Norman M. [read post]
12 May 2020, 6:30 pm
Cornell Law Professor Michael Dorf and co-blogger Jonathan Adler argue that this was a serious error, making it likely that the five conservative justices will rule against the House. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:36 pm
At today's oral arguments, as Jonathan notes, some Justices were looking earnestly for a limiting principle for the topics of legislative subpoenas. [read post]
12 May 2020, 8:52 am
[There was a potentially pivotal exchange in today's Supreme Court oral argument over the House subpoenas seeking the President's financial records.] [read post]
12 May 2020, 8:07 am
Interview Transcripts: Rinat Akhmetshin: November 13, 2017 Stephen Bannon: January 16, 2018 February 15, 2018 Andrew Brown: August 30, 2017 Michael Caputo: July 14, 2017 John Carlin: July 27, 2017 Thomas Catan: October 18, 2017 James Clapper: July 17, 2017 Samuel Clovis: December 12, 2017 Dan Coats: June 22, 2017 Michael Cohen: October 24, 2017 Rick Dearborn: January 17, 2018 Diana Denman: December 5, 2017 Marc Elias: December 13, 2017 Boris Ephsteyn: September 28,… [read post]
12 May 2020, 6:30 am
I hope the editors of this important series consider commissioning such a volume to address the era of sectional conflict and the coming of the Civil War.I want to focus the rest of my comments on the overlapping themes explored in the thoughtful essays of Jud Campbell and Jonathan Gienapp. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:49 am
The legal challenge here is to open up the country fully when we cannot reasonably expect any vaccination program until next year, according to most experts. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:46 am
via jonathanturley.org This is Jonathan Turley. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:06 am
In an Op-Ed published in the Washington Post, former federal prosecutor Jonathan Kravis argues the Justice Department has made disastrous mistakes in the cases of Roger Stone and Michael Flynn. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:00 am
Jonathan Gienapp, for example, essentially asks what the Constitution even was when every piece of it seemed to be up for debate in this period, when our narrative may imply that constitutional meaning was only ever what the winners said it was. [read post]
11 May 2020, 7:28 am
“How Supreme Court Doctrine Protects Cops Who Kill (or Otherwise Use Excessive Force); A Reuters report suggests changes in qualified immunity doctrine have immunized police officers sued for misconduct”: Jonathan H. [read post]
