Search for: "LaBelle v. LaBelle" Results 6141 - 6160 of 12,199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2007, 7:13 am
Instead, the Court interprets Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) and its seminal 1957 decision in Conley v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 3:20 am
Therefore, the statute bears a legislative label of "civil. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:17 pm
While the unanimous opinion in Quanta v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 2:20 pm by Shelley Brown
Black/White & Brown: Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka KF 228 B76 B53 2009 Brown v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
  There was no document describing the use of pregabalin for the treatment of pain.In the USA, gabapentin had been widely used off-label for the treatment of pain (and indeed in July 1996 – the same time as the patent’s priority date – the US Food and Drug Administration complained about Parke-Davis promoting this off label use, eventually resulting in a $430 million fine). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:02 am by Alessandro Cerri
The Court referred to the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in PepsiCo Inc v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic, C-281/10, which found that it is certainly permissible to use physical products in order to "confirm the conclusions already drawn" from the designs. [read post]