Search for: "Law v. USA"
Results 6141 - 6160
of 6,908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2009, 12:24 pm
Chase Bank USA, NA. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:54 pm
The comments on Patently-O anticipate the end of State Street and business methods in the USA. '); //--> [read post]
31 May 2009, 9:29 am
USA were filed by both the Plaintiff law firm and the USA. [read post]
29 May 2009, 11:09 am
Wiwa v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:17 am
Fendi USA, Inc. 134 F.3d 48 (2nd Cir. 2002). [read post]
28 May 2009, 6:31 am
The latest issue of the Review of European Community & International Environmental Law (Vol. 18, no. 1, April 2009) is out. [read post]
27 May 2009, 6:00 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 560 F.3d 1087 (Mar. 27, 2009), the court struck down an arbitration clause with a class action ban as unconscionable under Oregon law. [read post]
27 May 2009, 5:30 am
Galstaldi v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 8:17 am
Philip Morris USA, et al. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:30 pm
See GunBroker.com LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:58 am
(A Global Day of Action in support of Davis has been organized by Amnesty International USA for May 19th. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:05 pm
Citisteel USA, Inc., PICS Case No. 09-0456 (C.P. [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
Penguin Group (USA) Inc., et al. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:00 am
Google changes trade mark policy: lets advertisers buy rivals’ trade marks as keywords in 194 countries (Out-Law) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Google and the value of brand advertising (IP finance) Nokia and iPhone; strong, famous and hip? [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:13 am
Both the USA (with which C v D was concerned) and India are parties to the New York Convention, but the basis of the Convention, as explained in C v D, as applied in England in accordance with its own principles on the conflict of laws, is that the courts of the seat of arbitration are the only courts where the award can be challenged whilst, of course, under Article V of the Convention there are limited grounds upon which other contracting… [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:46 am
The fact pattern that gave rise to the Suburban bust bears a certain resemblance to circumstances that led to the 2nd Circuit’s seminal 2003 decision in Zheng v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:46 am
The fact pattern that gave rise to the Suburban bust bears a certain resemblance to circumstances that led to the 2nd Circuit’s seminal 2003 decision in Zheng v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:02 am
NEWS:
Righting the wrongfulsDetroit Metro Times - Detroit,MI,USA"Michigan, like most states in recent years, has enacted laws changing criminal justice procedures in response to the more than 200 exonerations nationwide ... [read post]
6 May 2009, 9:25 am
The law, however, requires more. [read post]
