Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 6141 - 6160
of 7,387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2010, 8:10 am
There remains enough real estate on the larger component of the desk to place the charger for my Bluetooth mouse, to lay my iPhone while recharging, and other minor junk. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 1:09 pm
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a case arising out of that election, Federal Election Commission v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:47 am
Taking a stab at it, the Court of Appeals has rejected an ADA claim that a restaurant mistreated a "manifestly disabled" woman whose service animal was an unwanted guest at this establishment.The case is Krist v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 6:41 am
Most notably and most recently, the California Supreme Court ruled for the defense in O’Neil v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 9:00 pm
Dans le cas d'espèce, le délai de 3 mois était amplement suffisant pour trouver un autre orateur pour la conférence ou un autre mandataire qui puisse se familiariser avec le dossier. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:55 pm
The defendants in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:43 am
The lawsuit filed in state district court in Travis County, Bhuiyan v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 5:22 am
To see this game in action, we need only take a quick stroll down memory lane to Rainer v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:01 am
When Zimmerman's calls are considered accurately, in their entirety, and in some context (all of which I tried to lay out in my prior post), I think that the case they make for Zimmerman as a serial racial profiler is weaker than those who haven't considered that evidence have tended to assume. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:10 pm
(If you have any doubt about that proposition, read Bradshaw v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 1:12 pm
In BouSamra v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 8:45 pm
One of the leading cases on this approach is Eagleman v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
The executive order, which is the first step in what is expected to be a very lengthy process to rewrite the rule, instructs EPA to rewrite the rule so that the definition of navigable waters is consistent with the standard set out by Justice Scalia in the 2006 case Rapanos v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:01 am
The classic “commuting expenses are not deductible” axiom meets the case of the “Commuting Cops” and one of my favorite cases that I have my students read, Margaret Green v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 4:13 am
Section 2 lays out the classes of persons subjected to this Act. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:02 am
The GRAG recommends that the panel consist of a person with medical expertise, a person with legal expertise and a lay person representing wider civil society as Chair. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:36 am
An expanded five judge appeal bench of the Full Federal Court has recently handed down its judgment confirming that artificial intelligence (AI) systems or devices cannot be an “inventor” under the Patents Act 1990 (Commissioner of Patents v Thaler [2022] FCAFC 62), reversing the decision of Justice Beach at first instance and bringing Australia into line with the position taken in other jurisdictions including the US, UK and Europe. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
” Later, Chief Justice John Marshall also was burned in effigy after writing the famous opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:24 pm
And pretty closely related to Thomas Ruffin's State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:45 am
The opinion is found at Wells v. [read post]
