Search for: "Lively v. State" Results 6141 - 6160 of 29,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Philip Thomas
On Tuesday Hinds County Circuit Judge Malcolm Harrison directed a verdict for the defendant in Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:27 pm
If you read only one Complaint this year, please make it the one that kicked off Harms v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm by Josh Blackman
Today, the Supreme Court issued an order on the emergency docket in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:00 pm by Robert L. Mues
 According to a study released on May 25, 2020 by the Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law at UCLA , same-sex weddings have generated $3.8 billion in local and state economic activity in the United States since the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage five years ago this month in Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:28 am by Venkat
However, this case in some ways reminded me of Mazur v. eBay, where eBay lost a section 230 defense in a case that revolved around live-bidding on eBay, which eBay supposedly screened. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 8:00 am by Josh Blackman
The State responded to that argument with barely a paragraph of analysis, Brief for Appellee in Robinson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:16 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court finds the plaintiff may proceed with his case even through his Article 78 was not successful.The case is Whitfield v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:00 am by Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
The Claimants (the Appellants) live in a property 850 yards from the track and brought a claim for damages and an injunction against the Defendants. [read post]